company logo

Product

Our Product

We are Reshaping the way Developers find and fix vulnerabilities before they get exploited.

Solutions

By Industry

BFSI

Healthcare

Education

IT & Telecom

Government

By Role

CISO/CTO

DevOps Engineer

Resources

Resource Library

Get actionable insight straight from our threat Intel lab to keep you informed about the ever-changing Threat landscape.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Threat Digest

Company

Contact Us

Have queries, feedback or prospects? Get in touch and we shall be with you shortly.

loading..
loading..
loading..
Loading...

Darkweb

Creditcard

loading..
loading..
loading..

10 Crore Credit And Debit Card Holders Data Released on The Dark Web

Rajshekhar Rajaharia declared on Sunday that information of nearly 10 crore credit and debit card holders in the country is being sold for an unrevealed amount...

05-Jan-2021
2 min read

No content available.

Related Articles

loading..

Cryptojacker

ansomware and infostealers dominate cybersecurity headlines, a lesser-known mena...

While ransomware and infostealers dominate cybersecurity headlines, a lesser-known menace lurks in the shadows: cryptojacking malware. CyberArk’s recent discovery of **MassJacker**, a sophisticated cryptojacking operation, reveals how threat actors exploit cryptocurrency’s popularity to siphon funds undetected. With over **750,000 compromised wallets** and a single Solana address holding **$300,000+**, MassJacker exemplifies the stealth and profitability of modern cybercrime. ### **Infection Chain: From Pirated Software to Cryptocurrency Theft** The attack begins on **pesktop[.]com**, a site masquerading as a hub for pirated software. Users unknowingly download a malicious payload, triggering a multi-stage infection: 1. **Initial Scripts**: A cmd script executes PowerShell to fetch three executables, including the **Amadey botnet** (a known malware distributor). 2. **Dotnet Payloads**: Two executables (32-bit and 64-bit) deploy layered DLLs (PackerD1 and PackerD2) with advanced anti-analysis techniques. 3. **Process Injection**: The final payload, **MassJacker**, is injected into *InstalUtil.exe* to evade detection. ### **Anti-Analysis Arsenal: How MassJacker Evades Detection** MassJacker employs cutting-edge obfuscation methods to thwart researchers: 1. **JIT Hooking** - Manipulates the .NET Just-In-Time compiler to replace legitimate functions with malicious code mid-execution (Figure 2). - Renders static analysis ineffective by altering method implementations dynamically. 2. **Metadata Token Mapping** - Maps fields to functions using token pairs, creating convoluted control flows. - Similar to techniques used in **MassLogger**, a malware linked to the same threat actors. 3. **Custom Virtual Machine (VM)** - Executes scripts stored in encrypted resources (Figure 6). - Uses stack-based instructions to deobfuscate strings and configuration data. 4. **String Obfuscation** - Conceals critical strings (e.g., wallet regexes, C2 servers) using non-readable delimiters. ### **Connecting the Dots: MassJacker’s Link to MassLogger** CyberArk’s analysis uncovered striking parallels with **MassLogger**, a credential-stealing malware: - Identical JIT Hooking and token mapping workflows. - Shared code structures (e.g., `CountAnnotation` and `smethod_22` functions). - Likely developed by the same threat group, repurposing tools for cryptojacking. _“This isn’t just a coincidence—it’s a strategic evolution,” notes Ari Novick, lead researcher. “These actors are diversifying their arsenal.”_ ### **Cryptojacking in Action** Once deployed, MassJacker: - **Monitors Clipboards**: Replaces copied cryptocurrency addresses with attacker-controlled wallets using regex patterns (Figure 10). - **Downloads Wallet Lists**: Fetches encrypted *recovery.dat* and *recoverysol.dat* files from C2 servers, containing thousands of wallet addresses. - **Evades Debugging**: Spawns infinite threads to check for debuggers, complicating dynamic analysis. ### **A $300K Treasure Chest** CyberArk’s decryption of historical C2 data revealed: - **778,531 Unique Addresses**: Spanning Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and more. - **423 Active Wallets**: Holding ~$95,300 at analysis time, with historical balances exceeding **$336,700**. - **The Motherlode**: A Solana wallet (*CJpe4dUcV5Knc2XZKTVsTNHm2MpmJGJNWCJdkfbNdYF5*) accumulated **$300,000+** through 350+ transactions, including NFT trades (Figure 12). ### **Why Cryptojackers Fly Under the Radar** Despite their profitability, cryptojackers like MassJacker lack notoriety due to: 1. **Sandbox Evasion**: Malicious behavior (clipboard monitoring) only triggers under specific user interactions. 2. **Static Analysis Blind Spots**: Over 35 AV engines flag PackerD1/D2 as malicious but fail to identify cryptojacking intent. 3. **Volatile Profits**: Many wallets remain empty, and earnings pale compared to ransomware’s multimillion-dollar ransoms.

loading..   11-Mar-2025
loading..   3 min read
loading..

Outage

DDoS

Dark Storm hacktivists declare war on X with DDoS attacks, forcing Elon Musk to ...

The pro-Palestinian hacktivist collective **Dark Storm** has brazenly claimed responsibility for **coordinated DDoS attacks** that crippled X (formerly [Twitter](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/400-million-twitter-users-data-allegedly-for-sale-on-dark-web-forum)) globally on Monday. The outages sparked panic among millions of users, prompting owner **Elon Musk** to confirm a _"massive cyberattack"_ while stopping short of naming the perpetrators. **Dark Storm**, a shadowy group notorious for targeting Israeli, European, and U.S. entities since its 2023 inception, flooded X’s servers with traffic, overwhelming its infrastructure. Screenshots and **check-host.net links** shared on their Telegram channel archived allegedly prove the attack’s ferocity—a tactic eerily reminiscent of **[Anonymous Sudan](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/anonymous-sudan-admits-layer-7-d-do-s-attack-on-open-ai-s-chat-gpt)’s 2024 take-downs of [Microsoft](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/unpatched-microsoft-office-zero-day-vulnerability-poses-data-leak-risk-1) and [Cloudflare](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/cloudflare-r2-crash-disables-services-for-59-minutes-causing-13-6-log-loss)**. ### **Musk’s Cryptic Warning: A Country Could Be Involved** In a chilling post on X, Musk [warned](https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1899149509407473825) of a sophisticated assault: *“We get attacked every day, but this was done with a lot of resources. Either a large, coordinated group **and/or a country** is involved.”* The billionaire’s allusion to **state-sponsored actors** has ignited speculation about geopolitical motives. Is this retaliation for X’s content policies? A proxy strike in the Israel-Hamas war? Dark Storm’s Telegram posts glorify "resistance operations," but experts warn the group may be a front for **nation-state hackers**. --- ### **Cloudflare to the Rescue—But at What Cost?** X has now enabled **[Cloudflare](https://www.secureblink.com/cyber-security-news/cloudflare-mitigates-largest-recorded-d-do-s-attack-peaking-at-3-8-tbps)’s DDoS protection**, slamming the gates with aggressive CAPTCHA checks. Users report rampant disruptions, including the *help.x.com* portal being locked behind Cloudflare’s security—a desperate move revealing the platform’s vulnerability. - 🛑 **Global Reach**: Outages hit North America, Europe, and Asia—regions where X is a critical hub for real-time news. - 🔥 **Escalating Hacktivism**: Dark Storm’s attack mirrors **Anonymous Sudan’s 2024 rampage**, which U.S. authorities linked to Sudanese operatives. - 🌐 **Geopolitical Flashpoint**: With Dark Storm’s pro-Palestinian stance, experts fear this could ignite a **cyberwar spillover**. ### **Inside Dark Storm’s Playbook** The group’s modus operandi relies on botnets—armies of hijacked devices—to flood targets with junk traffic. Check-host.net data shared by Dark Storm shows requests spiking to 1.2 million per minute during the attack, a volume only achievable with elite resources. **Cybersecurity Analyst Jane Harper** warns: *"This isn’t script kiddies. The scale suggests **nation-state infrastructure** or a well-funded mercenary group. Cloudflare’s involvement is a Band-Aid—X remains a prime target."* **⚠️ Psychological Warfare: Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt** Dark Storm’s Telegram taunts weaponize **FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt)**: - “*X will fall. Prepare for the storm.*” - “*This is just the beginning.*” Such rhetoric fuels user anxiety, driving engagement—and ad revenue—for both attackers and platforms. X’s reliance on Cloudflare’s CAPTCHA walls now alienates legitimate users, a **lose-lose scenario** ripe for exploitation.

loading..   11-Mar-2025
loading..   3 min read
loading..

ODIS

NTT

Telecom Giant’s Fourth Major Cyber Incident Since 2020 Reflects Escalating Threa...

NTT Communications Corporation, a linchpin of Japan’s telecommunications network serving over 10 million businesses globally, has confirmed a catastrophic breach exposing sensitive data from 17,891 corporate clients. The incident, detected in February 2025, underscores systemic vulnerabilities in Japan’s critical infrastructure and ignites debate over corporate accountability in an era of relentless cyber warfare. ### **Breach Timeline: A Multi-Stage Attack** **5 February 2025**: - **Discovery**: NTT’s Security Operations Center (SOC) identified anomalous activity in its **Order Information Distribution System (OIDS)**, a centralized platform managing corporate client contracts, service details, and billing. Initial logs suggested unauthorized access via compromised administrative credentials. **6 February**: - **Containment**: NTT severed external connections to OIDS, isolating the system. Preliminary analysis confirmed data exfiltration but could not determine the breach’s origin point. **15 February**: - **Lateral Movement Detected**: Forensic investigators discovered threat actors had pivoted to a secondary device within NTT’s internal network—a legacy server running outdated Windows Server 2012 software. The server, reportedly scheduled for decommissioning in 2024, lacked critical security patches. - **Final Mitigation**: The device was disconnected, and NTT initiated a network-wide password reset and multi-factor authentication (MFA) rollout. **Ongoing Investigation**: - As of March 1, NTT’s third-party cybersecurity partner, Trend Micro, has yet to identify the initial access vector. Suspicion surrounds **phishing campaigns** targeting employees or **API vulnerabilities** in OIDS’s third-party integrations. ### **Compromised Data of Corporate Espionage** The OIDS breach exposed metadata critical for supply chain attacks: 1. **Corporate Identifiers**: Registered contract names, contract numbers, and service usage histories. 2. **Representative Details**: Full names, work phone numbers, and corporate email addresses. 3. **Operational Data**: Physical addresses linked to service installations and administrative contacts. **Exclusions**: - Consumer data, financial records, and NTT Docomo mobile contracts remained secure due to air-gapped systems. **Risk Assessment**: - **Kyocera Communications Systems**, a major NTT client, warned partners of potential phishing and Business Email Compromise (BEC) scams. Cybersecurity firm **CrowdStrike** noted that stolen metadata could fuel **tailored social engineering attacks** against supply chains. --- ### **NTT’s Controversial Response** **Communication Strategy**: NTT declined to issue personalized notifications, citing “operational impracticality” given the scale of impacted entities. A single public notice was posted to its website—a move condemned by experts. **Dr. Kenji Nakamura**, Director of the Japan Cyber Threat Intelligence Center (JCTIC), stated: > “Telecom providers are the backbone of national security. Opaque communication erodes stakeholder trust and hampers collective defense efforts.” **Operational Measures**: - Deployed **AI-driven endpoint detection** across all networks. - Partnered with **Palo Alto Networks** for real-time threat hunting. - Initiated a $200 million infrastructure modernization program targeting legacy systems. --- ### **Recurring Target** NTT’s cybersecurity struggles are well-documented: **May 2020**: - Hackers infiltrated NTT’s internal network via a compromised VPN, leaking data from 621 clients. **January 2025**: - A **state-sponsored DDoS attack** (attributed to **APT41** by private analysts) disrupted mobile services for 12 hours, costing an estimated $45 million in downtime. **Expert Analysis**: - **Motivations**: The 2025 breaches align with geopolitical tensions. APT41, linked to China, has historically targeted Japanese tech firms for intellectual property. - **Technical Weaknesses**: Aging IT infrastructure plagues Japan’s telecom sector. Over 40% of NTT’s servers ran unsupported OS versions in 2024, per a **METI report**. --- ### **Japan’s Accountability Gap** While Japan’s **Revised Personal Information Protection Act (2024)** mandates consumer breach disclosures, corporate data lacks equivalent safeguards. **Key Issues**: - **Notification Laws**: Unlike the EU’s GDPR, Japan imposes no deadlines or penalties for delayed corporate breach notifications. - **Critical Infrastructure Designation**: Telecoms remain excluded from Japan’s 2023 Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, limiting mandatory security protocols. **Political Reaction**: - **Takashi Fujiwara**, Minister of Internal Affairs, announced a parliamentary review of cyber laws, urging “urgent reforms to match evolving threats.” --- ### **A Case Study in Supply Chain Risk** The breach highlights vulnerabilities in third-party vendor ecosystems: **OIDS Integrations**: The compromised system linked to 14 third-party vendors, including cloud providers and billing platforms. - **MITRE ATT&CK Framework**: Investigators mapped the attack to **Tactics TA0007 (Lateral Movement)** and **Technique T1210 (Exploitation of Remote Services)**, emphasizing poor network segmentation. **Comparative Analysis**: Similar breaches at **British Telecom (2023)** and **Verizon (2022)** exploited third-party APIs, costing an average of $4.3 million per incident (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report). --- ### **Stakeholder Reactions** **Corporate Clients**: - **Sony Group**: Conducting internal audits to assess exposure risks. - **Mitsubishi Corporation**: Demanded NTT subsidize cybersecurity upgrades for affected clients.

loading..   11-Mar-2025
loading..   4 min read