company logo

Product

Our Product

We are Reshaping the way Developers find and fix vulnerabilities before they get exploited.

Solutions

By Industry

BFSI

Healthcare

Education

IT & Telecom

Government

By Role

CISO

Application Security Engineer

DevsecOps Engineer

IT Manager

Resources

Resource Library

Get actionable insight straight from our threat Intel lab to keep you informed about the ever-changing Threat landscape.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Threat Digest

Company

Contact Us

Have queries, feedback or prospects? Get in touch and we shall be with you shortly.

loading..
loading..
loading..
Loading...

Healthcare

loading..
loading..
loading..

Yale New Haven Health System Data Breach Exposes Personal Information of 5.5 Million Patients

Yale New Haven Health data breach exposed the personal information of 5.5M patients in a major 2025 cyberattack, putting sensitive data at risk and causing laws...

26-Apr-2025
11 min read

No content available.

Related Articles

loading..

DaVita

Interlock

Interlock ransomware claims theft of 20TB from DaVita Healthcare, leaking 1.5TB ...

**Denver, CO** — Patients reliant on life-saving dialysis treatments from DaVita Healthcare Partners Inc. are confronting a new threat: the potential exposure of their sensitive personal and medical data. The Interlock ransomware group, a rising cybercriminal entity, has claimed responsibility for stealing **20 terabytes of data** from the healthcare giant, including the personal details of millions of patients. While 1.5 terabytes of this data have already been leaked on the dark web, the group is now attempting to monetize the remaining 18.5 terabytes, escalating fears of widespread identity theft, insurance fraud, and privacy violations. ### **A Timeline of Events** The cyberattack unfolded on **April 12, 2025**, when Interlock infiltrated DaVita’s systems, encrypting critical infrastructure and disrupting internal operations. DaVita, which operates over **3,000 outpatient dialysis centers globally** and serves approximately **281,100 patients**, promptly notified the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) but withheld specifics to avoid compromising its investigation. The disclosure triggered a **3% drop in DaVita’s stock price**, reflecting investor anxiety over the breach’s financial and reputational fallout. By early May, Interlock began leaking stolen data on its dark web portal, including patient names, Social Security numbers, medical histories, and treatment records. Screenshots reviewed by *Hackread.com* confirm the authenticity of some posted files, though DaVita has yet to verify the full extent of the breach. _“We are disappointed in these actions against the healthcare community and will continue working to defend against such attacks,”_ a DaVita spokesperson said, emphasizing efforts to safeguard patient care continuity. --- ### **Interlock’s Growing Threat to Healthcare** Emerging in **October 2024**, Interlock has rapidly gained notoriety for high-impact ransomware campaigns. The group employs a double-extortion model: encrypting victims’ systems and exfiltrating data to pressure organizations into paying ransoms. According to **Paul Bischoff, Consumer Privacy Advocate at Comparitech**, Interlock has executed **13 confirmed attacks** and claims **17 U.S. healthcare breaches in 2025 alone**. _“Healthcare providers are prime targets due to the critical nature of their services and the sensitivity of patient data,”_ Bischoff told *Hackread.com*. _“Attacks like DaVita’s can paralyze operations and leave victims vulnerable to exploitation for years.”_ Interlock’s prior targets include the **Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center**, where a 2024 breach compromised records of **530,000 individuals**. The group’s escalating activity mirrors a broader crisis: **25.7 million patient records** were exposed in **160 healthcare ransomware incidents** in 2024, per Comparitech data. --- ### **Patient Risks and Industry Implications** The DaVita breach poses dire risks for patients, particularly those undergoing dialysis—a lifeline for individuals with end-stage renal disease. Leaked data could enable: - **Medical identity theft**: Fraudulent insurance claims or prescription fraud. - **Targeted phishing schemes**: Criminals posing as healthcare providers. - **Discrimination**: Exploitation of sensitive health conditions in employment or insurance contexts. Cybersecurity experts warn that even partial data leaks can have cascading consequences. “Once data is on the dark web, it’s nearly impossible to retract,” Bischoff noted. “Victims must monitor their accounts indefinitely.” --- ### **DaVita’s Response and Regulatory Scrutiny** DaVita has activated incident response protocols, including third-party cybersecurity audits and patient notification systems. However, the company faces mounting scrutiny over its data protection practices. Under the **Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)**, healthcare providers must implement safeguards against cyber threats—a standard critics argue DaVita failed to meet. The breach also reignites debates about ransomware payments. While DaVita has not confirmed whether it negotiated with Interlock, the FBI discourages payments, arguing they incentivize further attacks. As DaVita races to contain the fallout, the Interlock breach serves as a grim reminder: in an era of escalating cyber warfare, healthcare providers—and the patients who depend on them—are increasingly in the crosshairs.

loading..   26-Apr-2025
loading..   4 min read
loading..

Zero Day

Watering Hole

We have been tracking the latest attack campaign by the Lazarus group since last...

Lazarus Group‚ North Korea's most notorious hacking collective, has breached at least six major South Korean corporations using never-before-seen vulnerabilities in mandatory security software. Dubbed **Operation SyncHole*, the campaign exploited weaknesses in tools required for online banking and government services, marking one of the most sophisticated supply-chain attacks in recent memory. --- ## Cyber Espionage Campaign Targets Critical Industries The Lazarus Group, sanctioned by the UN for funding Pyongyang‚Äôs weapons programs, infiltrated organizations across software development, semiconductor manufacturing, telecommunications, and finance between November 2024 and February 2025. Kaspersky researchers revealed that the attackers weaponized *Cross EX* and *Innorix Agent*‚Äîtwo programs mandated by South Korean law for secure web transactions‚to hijack systems and steal sensitive data[^1]. Victims included unnamed Fortune 500 semiconductor firms and IT giants central to South Korea‚Äôs tech-dominated economy. While six companies are confirmed compromised, analysts warn the true scale is likely far greater. ‚ÄúThese tools are installed on millions of devices,‚Äù said Sojun Ryu, a Kaspersky researcher. ‚ÄúEvery user who updated their software was a potential target[^1].‚Äù --- ### Watering Hole Attacks The operation began with a **brazen manipulation of South Korean media**. Hackers compromised legitimate news websites, embedding code that redirected specific visitors to fake software download portals. One such site, *smartmanagerex[.]com*, mimicked the official Cross EX vendor, tricking users into triggering exploits[^1]. ‚ÄúImagine reading the morning news and unknowingly downloading malware,‚Äù explained a KrCERT spokesperson. ‚ÄúThe Lazarus Group profiled visitors like predators at a watering hole, striking only high-value targets[^1].‚Äù --- ### Zero-Day Exploits: The Invisible Keys to South Korea‚Äôs Networks At the campaign‚Äôs core lay two critical vulnerabilities: 1. **Cross EX Privilege Escalation**: A flaw in the widely used browser plugin allowed hackers to execute malicious code with system-level access. Researchers confirmed identical attack patterns across all victims, suggesting a single exploit chain[^1]. 2. **Innorix Agent Arbitrary File Download**: A patched but previously unknown vulnerability (KVE-2025-0014) let attackers move laterally through corporate networks, deploying backdoors on internal devices[^1]. The Lazarus Group even developed a custom tool, *Innorix Abuser*, to automate victim profiling and payload delivery. ‚ÄúThis wasn‚Äôt a smash-and-grab‚Äîit was a surgical strike,‚Äù noted Ryu. ‚ÄúThey understood South Korea‚Äôs digital infrastructure better than many local firms[^1].‚Äù --- ## Spy Tools Borrowed from Cybercrime‚Äôs Darkest Corners Operation SyncHole showcased Lazarus‚Äô rapidly evolving toolkit, blending legacy malware with cutting-edge tradecraft: ### ThreatNeedle 2.0: The Spy That Never Sleeps An upgraded version of Lazarus‚Äô signature backdoor used **Curve25519 elliptic-curve encryption** to secure communications. The malware‚Äôs ‚ÄúCore‚Äù component supported 37 commands, enabling real-time file theft, screen capture, and persistence via compromised Windows services[^1]. ### wAgent‚Äôs Crypto Twist Masquerading as *liblzma.dll*, this revamped malware employed the **GNU GMP library** for RSA encryption‚Äîa first for Lazarus. It communicated via HTTP requests disguised as routine browser traffic, complete with decoy cookies like `__Host-next-auth-token[^1]`. ### SIGNBT and COPPERHEDGE: The Cleanup Crew Later attack phases shifted to **SIGNBT 1.2** and **COPPERHEDGE**, tools optimized for evading detection. COPPERHEDGE hid configuration files in Alternate Data Streams (ADS), while SIGNBT used RSA-encrypted AES keys to cloak exfiltrated data[^1]. --- ## How Researchers Unraveled the Plot The breakthrough came from analyzing command timestamps. ‚ÄúMalware executions clustered between GMT 00:00‚Äì09:00‚ÄîPyongyang‚Äôs business hours,‚Äù revealed Ryu. This temporal footprint, paired with historic Lazarus tactics, cemented North Korean attribution[^1]. A critical error also exposed the hackers: **misused Windows commands**. ‚ÄúThey tried killing processes with `/im` instead of PID numbers,‚Äù chuckled a researcher. ‚ÄúEven elite spies get sloppy[^1].‚Äù --- ## Fallout and Future Threats While patches for Cross EX and Innorix Agent are now available, experts warn the Lazarus Group retains stolen source code. ‚ÄúMore zero-days are inevitable,‚Äù cautioned a KrCERT advisory. South Korea‚Äôs National Cyber Security Center has urged corporations to: - Audit all software dependencies - Monitor for anomalous SyncHost.exe activity - Deploy behavior-based threat detection This detects related malware as `Trojan.Win64.Lazarus` and `MEM:Trojan.Win32.SEPEH.gen`, but the Lazarus Group‚Äôs shift toward **lightweight, modular tools** poses an ongoing challenge. As Ryu grimly notes, ‚ÄúToday‚Äôs fix is tomorrow‚Äôs exploit. This war has no end[^1].‚Äù

loading..   25-Apr-2025
loading..   4 min read
loading..

Cyberattack

Marks & Spencer suffers a cyberattack disrupting Click & Collect and contactless...

British retail giant Marks \& Spencer (M\&S) has confirmed it is managing a cyberattack that has disrupted several key customer services, including its Click and Collect system and contactless payment capabilities. The incident, disclosed on April 22, 2025, has forced the company to implement temporary operational changes while it works with external cybersecurity experts to investigate and resolve the situation. ## Cyber Incident and Its Immediate Impact M\&S revealed that it has been managing a cyber incident for several days, prompting the company to make what it described as "minor, temporary changes" to its store operations[^1][^2]. The cyber incident has primarily affected the retailer's Click and Collect system, causing delays for customers awaiting online orders[^1]. Customers have been advised to wait for confirmation emails before visiting stores for pickups[^9]. Beyond Click and Collect disruptions, the attack has also impacted: - Contactless payment systems in multiple stores[^2][^3][^10] - Gift card and voucher functionality, with some customers reporting inability to use these payment methods[^2][^10] - In-store refund processing capabilities[^2] Despite these disruptions, M\&S has emphasized that all physical stores remain open and that its website and mobile app continue to operate normally[^1][^5][^6]. The company has not disclosed specific details regarding the nature of the cyberattack or whether customer data has been compromised[^1][^3]. ### Timeline of Events The cyber incident appears to have begun during the Easter Bank Holiday weekend, with customer complaints appearing on social media platforms as early as Saturday, April 19, 2025[^3][^11]. The timing is particularly significant as Easter represents the second busiest trading period for retailers after Christmas[^10], potentially maximizing the impact on both M\&S operations and customer experience. M\&S officially confirmed the incident on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, through a statement to the London Stock Exchange and direct communications to customers[^5][^7]. As of April 23, 2025, the company was still working to resolve the issues[^1][^6]. ## M\&S Response and Crisis Management Upon discovering the cyber incident, M\&S implemented a multi-faceted response strategy focusing on containment, investigation, and customer communication. ### Technical and Operational Response M\&S has engaged external cybersecurity experts to assist with investigating and managing the incident[^1][^6][^9]. The company stated it is "taking actions to further protect our network and ensure we can continue to maintain customer service"[^7][^9]. These actions include reinforcing network security while working to restore affected services[^1]. As required by regulations, M\&S has reported the incident to: - The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC)[^2][^5][^7] - Relevant data protection supervisory authorities, including the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)[^2][^5][^7] ### Customer Communication M\&S Chief Executive Stuart Machin issued a statement apologizing for the inconvenience caused to customers[^2][^10]. The company has emphasized that "customer trust is incredibly important" and promised to provide updates if the situation changes[^5][^7]. William Dixon, a Senior Associate Fellow for Cyber and International Security at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), praised M\&S's customer communications about the incident as "textbook," highlighting the empathy, transparency, and reassurance provided in their messaging[^2]. ## Potential Nature and Motivations Behind the Attack While M\&S has not confirmed the specific type of cyberattack, cybersecurity experts have offered several insights based on the pattern of disruption. ### Ransomware Speculation The disruption to payments and online services suggests a possible ransomware attack[^3][^9]. If ransomware is indeed behind this attack, data may have been stolen to be used as leverage to convince the company to pay a ransom[^9]. As of April 23, 2025, no ransomware group or threat actor had claimed responsibility for the attack[^1][^9]. Cybersecurity analysts suggest that if ransomware is involved, attackers may attempt to pressure M\&S privately before making any public statements or demands[^1]. This aligns with typical ransomware tactics where stolen data is often used as leverage to extract payments from victims[^1]. ### Strategic Timing The timing of the attack during the Easter Bank Holiday weekend appears strategic. Ian McShane, a security expert at cybersecurity firm Arctic Wolf, noted that the challenges faced by M\&S demonstrate that "cyber attackers never take a day off"[^10]. He explained that "criminals are always seeking to create the most disruption with the least effort," and targeting a major retailer during a busy holiday shopping period maximizes impact[^10][^11]. ## Broader Context and Industry Implications The M\&S cyber incident is not occurring in isolation but rather as part of a concerning trend affecting major organizations in the UK and globally. ### Retail Sector Vulnerability The retail sector remains a prime target for cybercriminals for several reasons: - High public brand awareness that criminals can leverage for notoriety[^11] - Seasonal nature of the business, allowing attackers to time their strikes during critical sales periods to maximize pressure[^11] - Increasing adoption of omnichannel approaches and new technologies that expand the attack surface[^11][^3] According to reports, the consumer cyclicals and non-cyclicals sectors, which encompass retailers, were among the top five most targeted verticals by ransomware gangs in early 2024[^11]. ### Recent Precedents This incident adds to a growing list of similar cyberattacks affecting major UK organizations: - Transport for London was forced to shut down numerous online services following a cyberattack in September 2024[^3] - WH Smith was targeted in 2023, resulting in illegal access to company data, including personal details of current and former staff[^3] - Morrisons encountered significant issues with Christmas orders in late 2024[^10] A 2022 government report revealed that 39% of UK businesses reported cybersecurity breaches or attacks in a 12-month period, highlighting the widespread nature of the threat[^3][^8]. ## Expert Analysis and Recommendations Cybersecurity experts have provided several insights regarding the M\&S incident and its implications for organizational security practices. James Hadley, Founder and CIO at cybersecurity training firm Immersive, noted: "While M\&S communicated the issue clearly and has likely invoked tried and tested incident response processes, attacks like these serve as important reminders that businesses' perception of their cyber resilience may not align with their actual capabilities"[^2]. Jamie Moles, Senior Technical Manager at ExtraHop, emphasized the importance of early detection: "Incidents like this demonstrate how essential it is to have real-time visibility, threat detection and rapid response capabilities across all digital infrastructure. Network visibility can play a pivotal role, helping organizations detect anomalies early, isolate potential threats and maintain service continuity"[^2]. Daniel Card from Chartered for ITBCS remarked that the M\&S incident serves as a "reminder the gap often exists between our perception of cyber resilience and the reality"[^10]. He noted that even well-equipped organizations are not immune to attacks. ## Business Impact and Future Outlook The cyberattack comes at a critical time for M\&S, with its financial year having ended on March 29, 2025, and full-year results scheduled to be announced on May 21, 2025[^6][^15]. Stakeholders will be watching closely to see if the incident has any material impact on performance or customer confidence[^6]. The company's proactive engagement with authorities and cybersecurity experts signals a robust approach to crisis management, aiming to restore full confidence among its customers and investors[^6]. This incident will likely serve as an important test of M\&S's cyber resilience and crisis management capabilities.

loading..   24-Apr-2025
loading..   7 min read